The advantages and disadvantages of emerging Web 2.0 technologies for effective and personalised learning are being identified every day. As educators, one concern that we all share is the need to ensure a sensible approach so that learners, whether young or old, are safe when online. The key question is this:
- How can we develop effective policy and practice on e-safety for e-learning?
Rightly, many different groups including policy makers, educators, parents, carers and interest groups are becoming increasingly concerned at the way in which social networking websites are being exploited by unscrupulous people. Children and vulnerable young people are most at risk. In the US, the "Deleting Online Predators Act 2006" is proposing to remove the problem by banning such websites (
Download PDF). In effect, the consequence of such an action would be to remove many of the valuable e-learning sources that are currently being used with many learners.
The
Association of Colleges NILTA - the voice of the Further Education sector for ICT and e-learning in the UK - has raised concerns about the route to censorship in a recent post "
DOPA, social networks and keeping young people safe". In particular, they emphasise the impact this would have on the development of online learning and for disadvantaged groups.
"In addition to commercial ownership, the bill defines social network sites in terms of those which elicit personal information, include a personal profile, support blogging or journals, and enable communication amongst users" (AoC NILTA, 2006).
Within educational communities, applying such a definition would simply result in sites such as Blogger falling directly into this category. This and many other similar sites are already being used effectively by educators to develop imaginative, effective and supervised learning activities for both children and young people. Removing access to such sites within the managed learning environment of a school or college would prevent some young people and their educators from particpating in carefully planned e-learning programmes. Without private access to the internet this could also further aggravate the "digital divide".
There are very genuine worries about the kind of information and material that is readily accessible and can be shared via social networking sites. Whilst organisations such as the
Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre are undertaking important activities in this area, the real dangers and potential risks for personal safety and well-being are a concern of us all. BECTA provides some good resource material about
e-safety.
The essential task is to ensure an effective strategy for e-safety within learning communities. All young people, educators, parents, carers and communities need to accept responsibility and act accordingly, promoting understanding amongst children and young people about the benefits and pitfalls of social networking technologies in our digital age.
Labels: educators, lecturers, professors, protocols, teachers